patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Congressman Paulsen: Supreme Court Ruling Means 'Massive New Tax or Higher Insurance Premiums'

Erik Paulsen says health care bill burdens next generation with debt and threatens good private coverage.

 

Supreme Court Rules on Healthcare Law

I respect the ruling handed down by the Supreme Court last week, but it doesn’t change the fact that the health care law’s policy is flawed and remains very unpopular with the majority of Americans. Americans deserve a government that works towards meaningful health care reform, and not one that threatens good private coverage, robs $500 billion from seniors, burdens our children and grandchildren with debt and risks life-saving and life-improving medical device innovation nationwide. Our country—and its working and middle class families—simply can’t afford it. 

The ruling from the Supreme Court validates the fact that with the new healthcare law, Americans now have to choose between either a massive new tax or higher insurance premiums. I will continue to work to for common-sense solutions to lower health care costs for families and small businesses.

Read my statement on last week’s Supreme Court decision here.

Bipartisan Transportation Bill Sent to President’s Desk

Last Friday, Congress passed a transportation bill that was a compromise between Republicans and Democrats in the House and the Senate. While I preferred a longer five or six year plan, I supported this bill which extended and funded all related transportation programs for two years. The big positives of the bill include a more streamlined review process, accelerated emergency repairs, and an increased role for state and local governments on transportation projects to save time and money.

Check out my ECC video from last week, where I address the recent transportation bill.

Spending This Week Visiting with Neighbors

I spent this past week back home in Minnesota meeting with constituents at Congress on Your Corner events in Coon Rapids and Excelsior as well as pumping gas for neighbors at Bobby and Steve’s Auto World in Eden Prairie. As always, I appreciate hearing from you and thank everyone who dropped by to share their thoughts, concerns, and ideas with me.  

High gas prices were definitely on peoples’ minds. Fortunately, the House has taken bipartisan action on a package of seven energy bills to lower energy costs and create American jobs. The Domestic Energy and Jobs Act is the latest in a series of House-passed jobs bills targeted at helping to remove government barriers to economic growth and stop policies that drive up prices on American families and small businesses.

Over the last few years, total fossil fuel development has dropped 7% and total onshore acreage leased is the lowest since 1984. The nonpartisan Energy Information Administration estimates that oil production in the Gulf was down 22% in 2011 and projects it will decrease by 30% this year. I support long term comprehensive energy sources and strategies, including nuclear, wind, solar, and clean coal to meet our growing needs. We need to be filling up on American-made energy not only to bring down costs, but also to create American jobs.

Related Topics: Congressman Paulsen, Erik Paulsen, and obamacare

Donald Lee

1:26 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012

The links to the congressman's comments don't work.

Reply

rob_h78

2:11 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012

1) Congressman Paulsen can you direct us to any articles you wrote regarding the Heritage Foundation's push for Mandates over the long stretch of time that they were pushing them?

Or any articles you wrote where you spoke out against other Republicans pushing the concepts of Mandates right up until the time President Obama said "Ok, count me in"?

Or did your new found belief start only when Obama came on board with the Republican concept of Mandates?

2) What will you be proposing regarding the Massive Medicare Part D plan that not only is not paid for but (and get this) doesn't even allow the negotiation of drug costs when massive amounts of product is being purchased?

Will you see actively seeking a funding mechanism to pay the full cost - or will you be seeking to repeal Medicare Part D? Or if neither - how in the world is that justified?

3) Since you appear to accept and want to continue the concept of Health Care Free Loaders who get free care at ER's - leaving the rest of us to deal with the costs and ER's to lose money...

What will you specifically do to stop Health Care ER Free Loaders?

Will you push to repeal the "Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act"?

Or, will you force people who show up at the ER but can't pay to somehow actually pay their bills or let them opt out somehow?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom Garneau

10:31 am on Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Love to hear the Congressman's comments about the above...

Comment_arrow

Donald Lee

12:30 pm on Wednesday, July 11, 2012

The "question" above is less a series of "questions", and more of a series of comments, offered with a dose of cynicism and derision. I would not expect a response. If I were the congressman, I would not be inclined to respond in this forum.

Those of you who are serious about getting an answer will write to him directly:

http://paulsenforcongress.com/index.php?option=com_contact&view=contact&id=2

cindyella

5:37 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

http//www.louisvuittonoffi.com Louis Vuitton Official Website
http//www.monclerjacketsoutletvip.co.uk Moncler Outlet
http//www.goosevip.co.uk Canada Goose Outlet

Reply

Leave a comment